I first started looking at Rothblatt’s book: The Apartheid of Sex a couple of years ago. The second edition had a change of title to Transgender to Transhumanism which is a more explicit reference to Rothblatt’s agenda. I had done a post, in July 2021, specifically focused on what The Apartheid of Sex had to say about incarcerating males alongside females.
You can get a favour of his thinking from this extract:
Time moved on and if I thought about Rothblatt at all, it was that he was a deranged individual with some, mad, dystopian vision, which could not possibly be taken seriously. On that I was wrong. Rothblatt, in August 2022, was appointed to the board of trustees for the Mayo Clinic; a hugely influential, and wealthy, chain of hospitals run by a “charitable foundation”.
I determined that Transgender to Transhumanism warranted a further look and a series.
You can find the full series here: 👇
Here are a few quotes. If you are time limited I would suggest Chapter 6.
Rothblatt spends a lot of energy saying the category of sex is old-fashioned and creates sexism. He, however, claims to have a woman’s soul.
In the next breath he claims he changes “gender” with his hairstyles.
Martine is a married, heterosexual, father of three. He now claims to be a Lesbian. At the same time he argues that sexual orientation will not exist when we have abolished the “apartheid of sex”.
He wants to abolish women’s monopoly on gestation and childbirth and the terms “mother” and “father” should either be replaced or the “nurturing parent” can usurp the title mother. But, “gender identity ideology” is not based on sexist stereotypes? He is keen on the revolution in bio-technology to unmoor reproduction from the association with “males” and “females”. At the same time this sexist, man, warns about the dangers of biotechnology controlled by, you guessed it, sexist men.
On sport he believes sport should be mixed sex and argues that the only reason for sex segregated sports is to avoid hurting men’s egos. This is a blatant lie.
He also has the nerve to claim that it is sexual dimorphism that props up sex stereotypes. He further claims that an acknowledgement of biological sex limits the aspirations of girls and may also led them to identify as males! We all know our girls (and boys) are being indoctrinated into gender identity ideology from primary school onwards. The 4000% increase in female referrals to “gender” clinics is not being driven by a belief in biological sex but by people going along with Rothblatt’s dystopian vision.
He takes a criticism applied to gender identity theory and his response is the invert the truth and deflect the accusation back at his opponent. This is Goebbels level propaganda. If you are going to lie make it a big lie and keep repeating it; see “Trans women are women”.
He also leverages shame to enforce his believe system by repeatedly comparing a belief in biological sex and the need for some sex separated spaces to apartheid/racism.
Rothblatt even believes this idea will stand up to scrutiny and will survive when theory meets reality. Indeed he claims a monopoly on “objective reality”! 😳We are already seeing how this is working out with successive victories in the courts. Don’t forget the strategy outlined in the Denton’s document included “avoid press coverage”. This is recognition that their ideology can’t be honest about its goals because once people know the aims the consensus will, eventually, reject them. It’s also the reason for the relentless propaganda, in schools, academia, via the media and captured politicians. Rothblatt and his ilk have been indoctrinating our youth to create a consensus.
Thought police
Another inversion of truth is to accuse believers in sexual dimorphism of using thought police.
Every accusation is an admission.
Eugenics
Another Goebbels quote 👇. Given that Goebbels was propagating the most evil ideology of the twentieth century, which also was based on eugenics, I wonder at the embrace of this ideology from self-proclaimed socialists.
On Eugenics. This is also a quote from Rothblatt. 👇This is your hero Gender Identity proponents. Own it.
Your saved copy of the Nov 2019 Dentons document PDF compares textually as the same with that current at 2022. There are over 800 formatting and other changes but effectively they are the same document. If you have a pre-2019 PDF, please link it and I'll run the same analysis. It would be good to see when significant content changes occurred.