NHS “Transgender” policies.
Why are the NHS lying to women?
I have done a series on NHS Transgender policies to which I recently added three more NHS Trusts; Birmingham, East Cheshire and Leicestershire. All count men as if they are women, for the purposes of their single sex accommodation. NHS Trusts are required to have a policy on Single Sex Accommodation, to publish the policy and report any breaches. However, there is a lie at the heart of these policies covered by an Annex to the original policy on single sex spaces. Let’s make Annex B infamous.
Each hospital trust is required to pretend they are committed to single sex accommodation but this Annex made sure that men would be redefined as the female sex for the purposes of this policy.
My examination of these policies shows they have a reality denying definition of what constitutes your biological sex. They are even required to publish their single sex policy and report any breaches. At the same time these hospitals allow men, even part-time cross-dressers and people who, we are told, may change their “gender” daily, access to vulnerable female patients. As always my focus is on “trans” identified men because females don’t pose the same, (any), risk to men.
This is happening despite the fact that there have been over 1300 reported rapes on hospital premises.
This is not a recent phenomenon. Here is a document from 2008, written by a heterosexual, father who now describes himself thus:
Leicestershire took advice from a trans-identified man. A man who likes to share their public performance in the Vagina Monologues. You may remember that the people with the vaginas were discouraged from performances, celebrating women’s anatomy, but, apparently, it’s perfectly acceptable for people without vaginas to participate. Below is the piece on the first version of the Leicestershire policy.
Leicester updated their policy last year but pretended the earlier version did not exist and made no mention of the male advisor. I cover that below.
In both versions they lie about the law by adding “gender” in brackets; to pretend that the protected characteristic of “sex” includes men who self-identify as female.
All the policies I looked at also are prepared to overrule parents and accept a child’s statement on their “gender identity” whether or not they are deemed Gillick competent. Some also make it clear they go to elaborate lengths to conceal this policy from parents.
Staff are threatened with disciplinary action if they fail to comply. The Birmingham policies threaten the withholding of treatment for anyone who fails to accept a man is a woman. Women who object to being forced to share single sex accommodation with the new penis-bearing “women’s are compared to racists.
I will link the entire series at the end but if you want to know who is advising the NHS look no further than Tara Hewitt. Covered below: 👇
Hewitt is another trans-identified male who, inexplicably, seems to have secured a post, at a high grade, advising the NHS. Tara is an ex Conservative party candidate for the council elections. He is anti-abortion, Catholic and a proponent of sexual fetish. What could possibly go wrong?
You can read the series here:
I have been busy attending the events to oppose the imposition of Gender Identity Ideology, inScotland and plan two visits to London in the next couple of months. Paid subscriptions help support me. I will, however, keep content open in recognition that not all can afford to subscribe /donate.
Keep resisting!
Great work as always, Tish! The whistle blower, Jamie Reed, a counselor in a sloppy St. Louis "gender clinic" could help in revealing the casual, unsupervised practices in the affirmation glitter world. I've added some comments to an article on it from The Daily Signal.
https://wordpress.com/post/uteheggengrasswidow.wordpress.com/5344